I'll confess that
years have gone by, and I never looked into RSS or clicked on the 'RSS Feed' icon. I always assumed that it was one more technology that I likely didn't need, would take valuable time to learn, and was ultimately unnecessary.
I write this post on the brink of rethinking all of that.
Yes, it is taking valuable time to learn how to use RSS. Or perhaps to put it more accurately, to learn all of the related permutations of how one can use RSS.
But I'm coming to understand it as a potentially HUGE time saver. In the past, I've marveled at the pace and quantity of content generated by educators like
Victoria Davis on her blog. It seemed humanly impossible.
Now, with RSS, rapid responses and staying abreast of select current events seems manageable.
I'm unsure of all of the ways this technology will change my life's habits but feel sure that it will.
I do have a concern however - one that resonates with classroom experiences: I can introduce this tool to my students, and ask them to use it to stay current on a specific topic. Fine. But I know that they will likely also search for content that is of their own interest, that addresses the things that they think about. Once our class is over, I hope and anticipate that they will continue to use this technology. Might not my tweeny students restrict their online media consumption to very narrow, very specific interests? I fear a loss of common interests, a lingua franca. I get that this is the read/write web, and user generated content is paramount, but I can see how one could fill their entire world with up to the minute minutia, and think that they are well-informed and aware of current events.
4 comments:
I am in agreement with you. I think there is always more and more to learn and as a result there is more and more to do. Sometimes these and other technologies complicate matters. I know we must try to keep up, and technology does often times enhance our lives, but it often times allows a lot of "dumping" of information. I think we are all aware of how we get e-mail upon e-mail and the senders (often times myself) expects the recipient to read and understand all. I think we'll all be ok if we just continue to educate ourselves and learn what is necessary to enhance our own lives and those that we influence.
Welcome to the group of believers. It has also taken me several months to begin to reap the benefits of RSS feeds and to discover the variety of content that can be accessed through RSS.
It only gets better.
With the plethora of information online..(quite overwhelming in my opinion)..there is the fact that losing common interest, regardless of the medium or technologies we use, with our students is inevitable. I was wondering if you could clarify for me your concern? Do you feel that the topics you pose for class will not stir interest for the young? Even at my age, 28, I am finding the gap spreading ever so steadily between what I find worthy as compared to my students. =)
kimflick -
My concern isn't that the topics I pose for my class won't stir their interest.
It's this: I can anticipate that there will be certain students in my class who will ONLY collect information on dirtbikes. Others who will ONLY concern themselves with Pokemon. Others ONLY find more and more news about electric guitars. And with the volume and speed with which information and content is produced, I can imagine that these young people may believe that they are, in fact "staying current" with things. A media diet formed exclusively with feeds about the Jonas Brothers isn't staying current with the news.
But, with the decentralizing forces of the read/write web, who is to say what the news IS anymore?
And how are my young students to know?
Post a Comment